Hermes Vector

PoliticsTrending

DHS rejects GAO call for auto-activated ICE body cameras

The Department of Homeland Security rejected a Government Accountability Office recommendation for ICE to use auto-activated body cameras, citing privacy risks. The watchdog found gaps in camera usage and policy updates.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Français · Deutsch · हिन्दी · 中文

Checked against 5 sourcesAPupi.combiometricupdate.comtag24.comticklethewire.com
Illustration for: DHS rejects GAO call for auto-activated ICE body cameras

In brief

  • DHS rejected GAO recommendation for ICE to use auto-activated body cameras, citing privacy risks to informants and bystanders.
  • GAO found ICE lacks automated controls to ensure cameras are active during required enforcement interactions, unlike CBP.
  • Officers at some ICE offices had not used cameras despite training due to confusion over when activation was required.
  • ICE deployed about 4,800 body cameras through June, while CBP issued roughly 11,500, according to the GAO.

DHS rejects GAO call for auto-activated ICE body cameras

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has rejected a recommendation from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) implement technology to automatically activate body-worn cameras during critical incidents. The GAO report, released Wednesday, reviewed ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) camera programs from February 2025 through September 2026.

Automatic Activation Rejected

The GAO recommended that ICE adopt automated camera activation, similar to controls already used by CBP, to ensure footage is captured during unexpected use-of-force incidents. The watchdog stated that without such controls, there is a risk of "personnel not capturing footage of incidents when they are required to do so."

DHS disagreed with this specific recommendation, although it agreed with six of the GAO’s seven total recommendations. In its response, DHS argued that automatic activation "presents operational risks," including inadvertent or false activations during routine movement. The department stated that such errors could result in "the unauthorized recording of sensitive interactions with informants or victims" or the recording of bystanders engaged in First Amendment activities.

Jeffrey M. Bobich, the department’s executive director of financial management and systems, reiterated these concerns, noting that accidental recordings could capture protected activity. The GAO countered that DHS had not identified situations where automatic activation might safely be used or proposed alternative controls to prevent missing footage.

Gaps in Policy and Training

The audit found that neither ICE nor CBP had updated their body-worn camera plans since 2022 and 2024, respectively, despite significant growth in staff. The report highlighted confusion among officers regarding when cameras must be activated. At one ICE office, staff had not begun using the cameras even after receiving training because they were uncertain about the rules.

Key findings regarding program management include:

  • Lack of Automated Controls: Unlike CBP, ICE does not have automated controls to ensure cameras are active during required interactions.
  • Unclear Guidance: Personnel at six of ten field locations interviewed expressed uncertainty about when recording was required or prohibited, particularly during vehicle searches and detainee transportation.
  • No Performance Measures: Neither agency has implemented measures to assess if their camera programs improve transparency or accountability, aside from tracking basic data like the number of recordings.
  • Retention Policies: Non-evidentiary recordings are retained for 60 to 180 days, while evidentiary footage involving use of force or deaths is retained for 75 years under CBP schedules or indefinitely under ICE schedules.

Deployment and Scrutiny

The report comes amid increased scrutiny of ICE following several officer-involved shootings. In July, ICE officers shot and killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston; the officers were not wearing body cameras. In September, an ICE recruit shot and wounded Wilber Garcés Pérez in Austin; the officer had been issued a camera but was not using it.

According to the GAO, ICE had deployed about 4,800 body cameras through June, while CBP had issued roughly 11,500. DHS stated in a statement that while devices were purchased for all ICE officers, required training was still ongoing and expected to be finished "soon." Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said last month that the agency had not yet distributed the body cameras to all officers.

Why it matters

The rejection of automatic activation highlights a tension between operational privacy concerns and the demand for accountability in federal immigration enforcement. With ICE operating at a high tempo and facing criticism for excessive use of force, the absence of automated safeguards means that critical incidents may go unrecorded if officers fail to manually activate their devices. The GAO’s findings suggest that without clearer guidance and automated controls, the agency’s ability to provide transparent video evidence of enforcement actions remains compromised.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

Why did DHS reject the GAO's recommendation for automatic ICE body camera activation?
DHS argued that automatic activation presents operational risks, such as inadvertent recordings of sensitive interactions with informants or bystanders engaged in First Amendment activities. The department stated these errors could result in the unauthorized recording of protected activity.
What specific incidents prompted increased scrutiny of ICE body camera usage?
In July, ICE officers shot and killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston while not wearing body cameras. In September, an ICE recruit shot and wounded Wilber Garcés Pérez in Austin, but the officer had been issued a camera and was not using it.
How long are non-evidentiary and evidentiary recordings retained by ICE and CBP?
Non-evidentiary recordings are retained for 60 to 180 days. Evidentiary footage involving use of force or deaths is retained for 75 years under CBP schedules or indefinitely under ICE schedules.
What gaps in policy and training were identified in the GAO report?
The audit found that neither agency had updated their camera plans since 2022 and 2024, respectively, and personnel expressed uncertainty about when recording was required. Additionally, neither agency has implemented measures to assess if their camera programs improve transparency or accountability.
How many body cameras have been deployed by ICE and CBP as of June?
ICE had deployed about 4,800 body cameras through June, while CBP had issued roughly 11,500.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

PoliticsTrending

Trump Demands New Mexico Be Renamed 'New America' in Truth Social Post

President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social demanding New Mexico change its name to 'New America,' citing prestige and election integrity. This follows previous attempts to rename geographic features and occurs amid midterm election campaigning.

Checked against 2 sourcesrollingstone.commotherjones.com