Hermes Vector

Politics

Supreme Court rejects Trump administration bid to block California mail ballots

The Supreme Court denied a last-minute request from the Trump administration to require California to set aside approximately 20,000 mail-in ballots from alleged non-citizens.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Français · Deutsch

Checked against 6 sourcesBBCNBC NewsCNBCkcra.comdw.comcbsnews.com
Illustration for: Supreme Court rejects Trump administration bid to block California mail ballots

In brief

  • The Supreme Court denied an emergency request to have California set aside 20,000 mail-in ballots from alleged non-citizens.
  • The Justice Department claimed the ballots could 'debase or dilute valid votes,' but lower courts rejected the bid.
  • California officials argued the federal government's list of suspected non-citizens is inaccurate and could disenfranchise citizens.
  • The ruling arrives one day before the U.S. midterm elections.

Supreme Court rejects Trump administration bid to block California mail ballots

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a one-line order on Monday denying a request from the Trump administration for an injunction to stop California from counting mail-in ballots from approximately 20,000 voters whom the government alleges may be non-citizens.

Legal Challenges and Rulings

The Supreme Court's decision follows several unsuccessful attempts by the Justice Department to intervene in California's midterm election vote count. Two lower courts had previously rejected the administration's request:

  • Federal Appeals Court: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined the government's request to segregate the ballots, stating there was no evidence Congress intended federal law to pre-empt state election laws.
  • District Court: U.S. District Judge David Carter previously denied a request for a temporary restraining order, stating the administration's process for identifying alleged non-citizens was "rife with uncertainty and errors."

In a separate matter, Chief Judge James Boasberg ordered the Trump administration to stop making certain demands, stating, "The Executive Branch has likely violated the Constitution's Elections Clause, which commits authority over election rules to the states and Congress alone."

The Dispute Over Voter Lists

The Justice Department's request was based on a list of voters the administration "believe" are "likely" non-citizens. Solicitor General D. John Sauer stated in the application that "the United States is likely to succeed on the merits of its appeal" and argued that the administration suffers an "injury to its sovereignty" from the violation of laws prohibiting non-citizen voting.

California election officials have disputed the accuracy of the government's claims. Officials stated the list provided by the federal government is "riddled with inaccuracies" and expressed concern that eligible voters could be disenfranchised. California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the Supreme Court's denial "completely appropriate, very expected," adding, "This was a Hail Mary. It was baseless."

Election Context

The ruling comes on the eve of the midterm elections, which will determine control of the U.S. Congress. In California, a state with approximately 23 million registered voters, more than six million mail-in ballots had already been received as of Sunday night, according to the California secretary of state's office.

California officials noted that because voting has been underway since early October and many ballots have already been processed, segregating specific ballots would be logistically unfeasible. Once ballots are processed and signatures are checked, identifying specific voters becomes difficult as details are discarded before the vote is counted.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

What did the Supreme Court decide regarding the Trump administration's request?
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a one-line order on Monday denying a request from the Trump administration for an injunction to stop California from counting mail-in ballots from approximately 20,000 voters whom the government alleges may be non-citizens.
Why did the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reject the government's request?
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined the government's request to segregate the ballots, stating there was no evidence Congress intended federal law to pre-empt state election laws.
What did U.S. District Judge David Carter say about the administration's process?
U.S. District Judge David Carter denied a request for a temporary restraining order, stating the administration's process for identifying alleged non-citizens was "rife with uncertainty and errors."
What did California Attorney General Rob Bonta call the Supreme Court's denial?
California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the Supreme Court's denial "completely appropriate, very expected," adding, "This was a Hail Mary. It was baseless."

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.