Hermes Vector

Science

Scientists report fossilized red blood cells in 115-million-year-old dinosaur bone

Researchers analyzing Aratasaurus bones found structures resembling red blood cells and traces of heme, though some scientists remain skeptical of the findings.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Français · Deutsch · 中文

Checked against 2 sourcesThe GuardianNature
Illustration for: Scientists report fossilized red blood cells in 115-million-year-old dinosaur bone

In brief

  • Researchers identified round structures in Aratasaurus bones that resemble red blood cells.
  • Chemical tests on the 115-million-year-old bones identified heme and collagen amino acid building blocks.
  • Some scientists express skepticism, noting the structures are concave rather than dome-like.
  • The Aratasaurus fossils were discovered in a mine in 2008 and are held in the National Museum of Brazil.

Scientists report fossilized red blood cells in 115-million-year-old dinosaur bone

Researchers studying the hind leg bones of an Aratasaurus, a small, meat-eating dinosaur that lived in what is now north-eastern Brazil 115 million years ago, have reported finding structures that resemble fossilized red blood cells.

Research Findings

According to a study appearing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, electron microscope images of the bones revealed small, round structures in fine channels where blood vessels once ran. Chemical tests conducted on the bones identified the presence of heme, which is the organic compound that allows haemoglobin in blood to carry oxygen around the body. Tests also identified traces of the amino acid building blocks for collagen.

Prof Kliti Grice of Curtin University in Western Australia, who led the research team, stated, “We are seeing a mineral and molecular echo of the dinosaur’s original biology.” Grice noted that “Fossilised red blood cells with distinct chemistry related to heme have never been found in situ in any fossil, let alone a dinosaur. This is a world first.”

Grice suggested that a manganese compound called hausmannite, which formed in and around the cells, may have stabilized the structures prior to fossilisation.

Scientific Debate

The findings have prompted debate within the scientific community. Prof Mary Schweitzer of North Carolina State University expressed doubt regarding the identification of the structures as red blood cells. Schweitzer noted that the dinosaur’s red blood cells should have a “nuclear bulge” making them appear dome-like on both sides, whereas the structures found by Grice are concave.

However, Schweitzer was more persuaded by the discovery of heme and collagen amino acids, stating, “The conventional wisdom in palaeontology that all endogenous organics would disappear in a million years or less is being routinely challenged.”

Implications for Palaeontology

If the structures are confirmed to be fossilized red blood cells, researchers suggest it could allow for investigations into dinosaur blood, metabolism, and activity levels.

Grice urged caution regarding the implications, stating that the work does not imply that large biological molecules like DNA live on in ancient fossils. “The aim isn’t to find Jurassic Park DNA, it’s to determine how much genuine molecular information deep time can preserve,” Grice said.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

What specific dinosaur bone did researchers study?
Researchers studied the hind leg bones of an Aratasaurus, a small, meat-eating dinosaur that lived in what is now north-eastern Brazil 115 million years ago.
Why is this discovery considered a world first?
Prof Kliti Grice stated that fossilised red blood cells with distinct chemistry related to heme have never been found in situ in any fossil, let alone a dinosaur.
What is the main scientific debate regarding these findings?
Prof Mary Schweitzer expressed doubt because the found structures are concave, whereas she noted that dinosaur red blood cells should have a nuclear bulge making them appear dome-like on both sides.
What did Prof Kliti Grice say about the implications for finding DNA?
Grice stated that the work does not imply that large biological molecules like DNA live on in ancient fossils and that the aim isn't to find Jurassic Park DNA.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.