Hermes Vector

AI & SI

Big Tech lost big in the 2026 US election

Democrats won control of Congress and voters rejected data center measures in nearly every local contest, while three new Democratic governors promised to restrict or pause data center construction.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Français · Deutsch · हिन्दी

Checked against 6 sourcesThe Vergepolitico.comFortunetech-insider.orgfinance.biggo.comyahoo.com
Illustration for: Big Tech lost big in the 2026 US election

In brief

  • Democrats won control of Congress in the 2026 midterms.
  • Voters rejected data center measures in 37 of 38 local contests with complete counts.
  • Gina Hinojosa, Amy Acton, and Keisha Lance Bottoms won governor races promising to restrict or pause data center construction.
  • 56% of voters called AI and data centers a crucial or major factor in their decision, and 65% of that group backed a Democrat for Congress.

Big Tech lost big in the 2026 US election

On Tuesday, millions of American voters went to the polls and voted overwhelmingly for Democrats and against AI. The fight against Big Tech is about to come roaring back, and the fight over data centers is looking even harder for the folks trying to build them.

The ballot results

Out of 41 ballot measures nationwide with a question on data centers, Big Tech only scored one win in a Midwestern town with approximately 800 residents. The measures ranged from outright bans and moratoriums to new zoning laws that regulated data centers, along with limitations on size and new rules requiring future voters to decide if data centers can be built. The only win for Big Tech came from the tiny city of Harwood, North Dakota, whose residents rejected a new law that would have required an independent review for data center proposals.

Preliminary results tracked by Redbud Consulting showed voters opposing data-center development in 37 of 38 local contests with complete counts. CNET reported a similar picture with a slightly different tally: voters backed about 40 election-day measures restricting new data centers, and only one result, in Harwood, North Dakota, favored expansion.

The governors

The elections of three governors who campaigned on restricting data center development—Gina Hinojosa in Texas, Amy Acton in Ohio, and Keisha Lance Bottoms in Georgia—could be consequential for the AI industry’s future expansion.

Hinojosa has promised to impose a moratorium on data center construction and eliminate subsidies and tax breaks awarded to major data center developers. Governor-elect Amy Acton in Ohio has taken a similar position, calling for a conditional moratorium on new data centers unless developers agree to cover all their utility costs, use union labor, and meet environmental standards. In Georgia, Governor-elect Keisha Lance Bottoms promised a temporary statewide pause on new data center construction to assess the industry’s impact on electricity bills, communities, and the environment.

The political money

The more anti-regulation side of the AI industry — represented at the time by venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI — was already working to establish its first super PAC, explicitly modeled after a pro-cryptocurrency effort that had spent big in a few races to instill fear in lawmakers who had crossed them. Leading the Future, as the new AI committee was named in August, would commit itself to confronting what its leaders called “a vast force out there that’s looking to slow down AI deployment.”

In response, Carson began to tap those connections to create Public First, a super PAC network that would be a clearinghouse for pro-regulation cash. For Public First, their original goal was to see if they could raise $5 million from those AI safety advocates, Carson said. Then it became $10 million. Then $30 million.

In February, Anthropic decided to get involved with a $20 million donation from its corporate account to Public First’s associated nonprofit — which can’t directly back candidates or engage in electoral politics. In May, Amodei gave his first-ever public seven-figure political donation — of exactly $1 million — to Public First. And in July, Anthropic donated another $20 million.

The pro-AI Leading the Future spent some $8 million against New York State assemblymember Alex Bores, who narrowly lost the Democratic primary in his House race in June. Pro-regulation political groups ultimately spent over $19 million in favor of Bores — swamping LTF’s $8 million. Over $13 million of that pro-Bores money came from Jobs and Democracy PAC, an organization in the Public First umbrella.

Why it matters

According to the CNBC voter poll, 56% of voters called AI and data centers a crucial or major factor in their decision. Of that group, 65% voted for a Democratic candidate for Congress.

While members of soon-to-be Democrat-controlled Congress would need to pass legislation (and potentially overcome a veto by President Trump) to impose new restrictions on data centers, the incoming Democratic governors have more tools at their disposal, including the power to influence permitting, regulation, and tax incentives at the state level, although some actions may require the approval of state legislatures.

In a Wednesday note, longtime tech analyst Dan Ives said though tech companies may now face new obstacles to building out their data center capacity, the Democratic wins could actually be a positive for tech stocks as it will likely force hyperscalers, like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft, to slow down their capital expenditures, which are expected to hit at most $828 billion in 2026.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

What were the results of the 2026 US election regarding Big Tech and data centers?
Millions of American voters voted overwhelmingly for Democrats and against AI, with Big Tech scoring only one win out of 41 ballot measures nationwide. Preliminary results showed voters opposing data-center development in 37 of 38 local contests with complete counts.
Which three governors were elected on platforms restricting data center development?
The elected governors are Gina Hinojosa in Texas, Amy Acton in Ohio, and Keisha Lance Bottoms in Georgia. Hinojosa promised a moratorium and elimination of subsidies, Acton called for a conditional moratorium, and Bottoms promised a temporary statewide pause to assess impacts.
How much money did pro-regulation groups spend compared to pro-AI groups in the race for Alex Bores?
Pro-regulation political groups spent over $19 million in favor of Alex Bores, while the pro-AI group Leading the Future spent some $8 million against him. Over $13 million of the pro-Bores money came from Jobs and Democracy PAC, an organization in the Public First umbrella.
What did Anthropic and Dario Amodei donate to the pro-regulation super PAC Public First?
In February, Anthropic donated $20 million to Public First’s associated nonprofit, and in July, Anthropic donated another $20 million. In May, Dario Amodei gave his first-ever public political donation of exactly $1 million to Public First.
Why might the Democratic wins be considered positive for tech stocks according to analyst Dan Ives?
Dan Ives stated that Democratic wins could be positive for tech stocks because they may force hyperscalers like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft to slow down their capital expenditures. These expenditures are expected to hit at most $828 billion in 2026.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.