Hermes Vector

Politics

Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal on single-use plastics ban

The Supreme Court of Canada will hear an appeal determining if Ottawa's ban on six single-use plastic items remains in place. The case centers on the federal government's authority to classify plastics as toxic.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Français · Deutsch · हिन्दी · 中文

Checked against 4 sourcestheglobeandmail.comchrisd.caredfm.cawinnipegsun.com
Illustration for: Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal on single-use plastics ban

In brief

  • The Supreme Court of Canada will hear an appeal on the federal ban of six single-use plastic items.
  • The ban covers straws, stir sticks, cutlery, takeout containers, and six-pack rings.
  • The Federal Court of Appeal previously upheld the ban, ruling the toxic designation reasonable.
  • The plastics industry challenged the ban, arguing the government failed to prove all plastics are harmful.

Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal on single-use plastics ban

The Supreme Court of Canada announced Thursday that it will hear an appeal challenging the federal government’s ban on single-use plastics. The decision will determine whether the ban, which prohibits the manufacture and sale of specific plastic items, can remain in effect.

The Ban and Legal History

In 2022, Ottawa phased in a ban on the manufacture and sale of six single-use plastic items. According to the government, these items were chosen because they are commonly found in litter and have known, accessible alternatives. The banned items include straws, stir sticks, cutlery, takeout containers, and the six-pack rings used to hold soda and beer cans.

To implement the ban, the federal government listed "plastic manufactured items" as toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, following a scientific assessment. This classification was challenged by a group representing companies in Canada’s plastics industry, along with three chemical companies that manufacture plastics.

In 2023, the Federal Court ruled that the listing was too broad, stating that the federal government had failed to demonstrate that all plastic items harm human health or the environment. However, in January, the Federal Court of Appeal overturned this decision, allowing the ban to stay in place. The three-judge panel unanimously ruled that the decision to list plastic manufactured items as toxic was reasonable.

Arguments on Toxicity and Regulation

The plastics industry argued that a lack of testing to determine which plastics are harmful made Ottawa’s decision unreasonable. The Court of Appeal dismissed this argument, emphasizing the physical nature of the pollution problem rather than the chemical composition of the materials.

"To put the matter bluntly … the chemical content of (plastics) is irrelevant to the sea otter choking on a plastic straw. The problem is the plastic item itself, not its chemistry," the judges wrote.

The appellate judges also argued that the lower court had erred by viewing the regulatory process as one step, when it was actually a two-step process: designating plastics as toxic and then regulating individual plastic items.

Reactions and Next Steps

Karen Wirsig, senior program manager for plastics at Environmental Defence, said Ottawa should maintain the ban pending the Supreme Court decision. "It is rare for appeals to be granted so we were not particularly expecting it. However, it does open the opportunity for a stronger precedent for the listing from the Supreme Court of Canada," Wirsig told The Canadian Press.

The office of Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin confirmed that the plastics ban will stay in place until the Supreme Court rules on the matter. "Canadians understand the importance of reducing pollution and waste," Dabrusin’s press secretary Amy Falkner said in a statement. "The government will continue to work with all partners to reduce plastic waste and pollution."

The group representing plastics companies stated on their website that they welcome the opportunity to bring the case to the Supreme Court.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

What is the Supreme Court of Canada hearing an appeal about?
The Supreme Court of Canada announced Thursday that it will hear an appeal challenging the federal government’s ban on single-use plastics.
Which specific plastic items are banned under the regulations?
The banned items include straws, stir sticks, cutlery, takeout containers, and the six-pack rings used to hold soda and beer cans.
Why did the Federal Court of Appeal overturn the lower court's decision in January?
The three-judge panel unanimously ruled that the decision to list plastic manufactured items as toxic was reasonable.
Will the ban remain in effect while the Supreme Court considers the appeal?
The office of Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin confirmed that the plastics ban will stay in place until the Supreme Court rules on the matter.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

PoliticsTrending

Trump Demands New Mexico Be Renamed 'New America' in Truth Social Post

President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social demanding New Mexico change its name to 'New America,' citing prestige and election integrity. This follows previous attempts to rename geographic features and occurs amid midterm election campaigning.

Checked against 2 sourcesrollingstone.commotherjones.com