Hermes Vector

Tech

Google, Meta and TikTok sue California over child social media law

Google, Meta and TikTok have filed separate lawsuits to block California's Assembly Bill 1709, which restricts features for users under 16, citing First Amendment and Section 230 arguments.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Français · Deutsch · हिन्दी

Checked against 6 sourcesengadget.comabc7news.comindependent.co.uknypost.compymnts.combdnews24.com
Illustration for: Google, Meta and TikTok sue California over child social media law

In brief

  • Google, Meta and TikTok filed separate federal lawsuits to block California's Assembly Bill 1709.
  • The law prohibits addictive features for users under 16 and takes effect January 1, 2027.
  • The companies argue the law violates the First Amendment and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
  • California Attorney General Rob Bonta's office said it will defend the law.

Google, Meta and TikTok sue California over child social media law

Google, Meta and TikTok have filed separate federal lawsuits seeking to block a California law designed to protect children from social media harms. The lawsuits target Assembly Bill 1709, which Governor Gavin Newsom signed on September 10. The law is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027.

The law and the legal challenge

Assembly Bill 1709 prohibits social media platforms from offering underage children "psychologically exploitative features" that could lead to compulsive use, such as providing personal recommendations and sending videos through autoplay features. It also requires the deletion of children's accounts with those features. The law requires platforms to verify users' ages and implement "reasonable measures" to make sure those under 16 are not given access to addictive features.

The companies filed their lawsuits on Wednesday in different federal courts across California. Google filed in San Jose, Meta filed in San Francisco, and TikTok filed in Los Angeles. The lawsuits name California Attorney General Rob Bonta as the defendant.

All three companies argue the law violates the First Amendment and Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act. Meta wrote in its complaint that "The state cannot, consistent with the First Amendment, override Meta's editorial judgments." Google and TikTok made similar arguments.

Company statements

Meta said the law violates the First Amendment "by letting the government dictate how ideas are organized, displayed, or shared with Californians." The company added: "Under the law, we would be forced to either remove features that keep teens' experiences age-appropriate, or cut thousands of California teens off from family, friends, and their communities."

TikTok called the law "a blatantly unconstitutional restriction on free expression that erodes the long-standing and protected practice of curating content based on user preferences, which bookstores, TV networks and streaming services all use."

Google said it believes parents are in the best position to make decisions for their families and that it offers a range of parental control tools and protections. Spokesman José Castañeda said: "Overly broad laws like this actually break the systems we've built to help kids find high-quality, age-appropriate videos."

State response and broader context

Governor Gavin Newsom said when he signed the law that children's safety should always come first when considering social media platforms in California. The state "will not stand by while unregulated technology puts our children at risk," he noted.

The office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta said it was reviewing the filings and that it was committed to defending state laws to protect kids online.

The nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation has called the law "a massive privacy and free speech nightmare" and unsuccessfully urged Newsom to veto the policy.

Meta, Google, TikTok and Snapchat's parent Snap still face thousands of lawsuits by individuals, school districts, cities and government entities that claim social media platforms addict children and have caused a mental health crisis. In August, Meta agreed to pay up to $18 billion and limit teenagers' use of Facebook and Instagram under agreements with nearly all US states, which accused it of violating privacy and consumer protection laws.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

Which companies are suing California over the new child social media law?
Google, Meta, and TikTok have filed separate federal lawsuits to block the law.
What is the name and effective date of the law being challenged?
The law is Assembly Bill 1709, which Governor Gavin Newsom signed on September 10 and is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027.
What are the main arguments the companies make against the law?
All three companies argue the law violates the First Amendment and Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act.
Who is named as the defendant in the lawsuits?
California Attorney General Rob Bonta is named as the defendant in the lawsuits filed in San Jose, San Francisco, and Los Angeles.
What recent financial agreement did Meta reach regarding social media and teenagers?
In August, Meta agreed to pay up to $18 billion and limit teenagers' use of Facebook and Instagram under agreements with nearly all US states.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Tech

RM of Sherwood approves Bell AI data centre expansion

The Rural Municipality of Sherwood council unanimously approved bylaws to rezone 895 acres for Bell Canada's 1.2-gigawatt AI data centre expansion near Regina, following a public hearing.

Checked against 2 sourcesctvnews.caca.news.yahoo.com