Hermes Vector

Politics

DOJ investigates TV networks over antitrust claims in press pool suspension

The Justice Department is investigating ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News for possible antitrust violations after they suspended White House pool coverage in response to a ban on three news outlets.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Français

Checked against 4 sourcesnpr.orgCNBCaa.com.trBBC
Illustration for: DOJ investigates TV networks over antitrust claims in press pool suspension

In brief

  • The DOJ is investigating ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News for possible Sherman Act violations.
  • The probe follows the networks' suspension of White House pool coverage after CNN, MS NOW and Politico were banned.
  • A federal judge temporarily restored press credentials, but some outlets remained barred from Air Force One.
  • Press freedom groups denounced the investigation as an attempt to intimidate journalists.

DOJ investigates TV networks over antitrust claims in press pool suspension

The U.S. Department of Justice has launched a formal antitrust investigation into five major television networks: ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News. The probe centers on the networks' decision to suspend pooled coverage of President Donald Trump after the White House barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the premises.

The Antitrust Investigation

The Justice Department is examining whether the coordination among the networks constitutes a group boycott that violates the Sherman Act, a federal law prohibiting agreements that unreasonably restrain trade. The investigation follows the networks' joint decision to halt coverage on Sept. 21, shortly after the administration revoked credentials for the three news organizations.

"Members of the television press pool have proudly boycotted covering White House events. Group boycotts among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act," the Justice Department said in a statement. "The Antitrust Division is investigating to determine whether these news organizations have violated the antitrust laws."

The networks did not immediately comment on the investigation. However, in a joint statement regarding the initial suspension, they said, "No administration should reject a news organization because it objects to its reporting."

Press Access and Legal Challenges

The dispute began when President Trump accused CNN, MS NOW and Politico of spreading "FICTION and LIES" and barred them from the White House. The administration stripped White House press passes from more than 70 journalists. In federal court, the Justice Department cited national security grounds for the decision to bar the outlets.

A federal judge issued a temporary stay requiring the restoration of press passes for the affected reporters. Despite this ruling, reports indicate that CNN and Politico remained barred from traveling with the president on Air Force One. The networks had agreed not to substitute for CNN on days the administration blocked the network, a decision that resulted in no coverage of an event between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Reactions and Context

Press freedom advocates condemned the DOJ's move. Bruce Brown, president of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said, "[S]ummoning antitrust authority, on top of the retaliatory actions the White House has already taken to bar certain outlets, is another and even more brazen attempt to try to intimidate journalists."

Seth Stern, chief of advocacy for the Freedom of the Press Foundation, called the investigation "nonsense." He stated, "Depriving Trump of the attention he craves is not a competitive harm and in any case, antitrust law has long recognized First Amendment exceptions even when there is anticompetitive impact."

Michael Dorfman, a professor of Constitutional law at Cornell University, noted that while political motivation does not shield the government from legal repercussions, the networks' actions would be subject to a review of reasonableness. He highlighted a potential legal inconsistency: "If the networks agreeing not to cover the White House is illegal, why isn't the press pool itself illegal? Presumably the answer is that the kind of cooperation involved in the press pool is necessitated by the limited space in particular venues."

Why it matters

This investigation marks a significant escalation in the conflict between the Trump administration and the news media. It introduces antitrust law into a dispute traditionally handled through First Amendment arguments. The outcome could set a precedent for how the government regulates collaborative practices among media organizations, particularly when those practices are used to protest government actions regarding press access.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

Which TV networks are being investigated by the DOJ?
The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating five major television networks: ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News.
Why did the networks suspend pooled coverage?
The networks suspended coverage on Sept. 21 after the White House barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the premises.
What specific law is the DOJ examining?
The Justice Department is examining whether the coordination constitutes a group boycott that violates the Sherman Act, a federal law prohibiting agreements that unreasonably restrain trade.
How many journalists lost their press passes?
The administration stripped White House press passes from more than 70 journalists.
Why does this investigation matter?
It marks a significant escalation in the conflict between the Trump administration and the news media by introducing antitrust law into a dispute traditionally handled through First Amendment arguments.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

Comments