Reactions and Context
Press freedom advocates condemned the DOJ's move. Bruce Brown, president of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said, "[S]ummoning antitrust authority, on top of the retaliatory actions the White House has already taken to bar certain outlets, is another and even more brazen attempt to try to intimidate journalists."
Seth Stern, chief of advocacy for the Freedom of the Press Foundation, called the investigation "nonsense." He stated, "Depriving Trump of the attention he craves is not a competitive harm and in any case, antitrust law has long recognized First Amendment exceptions even when there is anticompetitive impact."
Michael Dorfman, a professor of Constitutional law at Cornell University, noted that while political motivation does not shield the government from legal repercussions, the networks' actions would be subject to a review of reasonableness. He highlighted a potential legal inconsistency: "If the networks agreeing not to cover the White House is illegal, why isn't the press pool itself illegal? Presumably the answer is that the kind of cooperation involved in the press pool is necessitated by the limited space in particular venues."