Faculty Concerns and No-Confidence Vote
The proposed resolution by the Cornell Faculty Senate declares no confidence in the administration's ability to handle reports of sexual assault on campus. Faculty members argue that the case reflects broader concerns about institutional accountability, retaliation against those who report misconduct, and the independence of campus police investigations.
Ariana Kim, an associate music professor at Cornell and co-sponsor of the resolution, described Kotlikoff’s lack of follow-up as "appalling." Kim, who has experienced bullying and sexual harassment by senior colleagues, stated that Cornell failed to properly document her complaints and that she was never clearly informed what disciplinary action had been taken. She said she was asked "what I had done to provoke the situation" and believes reporting the misconduct affected her tenure review.
Anne Marie Brady, a senior extension associate at Cornell’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations and another co-sponsor, questioned whether Cornell University Police can independently investigate serious allegations. "There doesn’t seem to be independence between the administration and the Cornell Police Department," Brady said. She welcomed the involvement of state police but questioned the timing of the announcement, noting it came just before the Senate debate.
The Faculty Senate, which has approximately 130 voting members, was scheduled to debate the resolution through Oct. 28, followed by electronic voting. A simple majority is required for passage.