Expert Views and Earlier Research
The study's authors say the findings open new avenues for molecular-level paleontology. "It opens exciting new avenues for molecular-level palaeontology, allowing us to investigate the evolution of blood, metabolism and even activity levels in ancient animals," Professor Grice said.
However, not all experts are convinced the structures are blood cells. Mary Schweitzer, an emeritus professor at North Carolina State University, told ABC Australia she found the blood-cell evidence unconvincing. "I have no problem with the presence of heme and collagen in the bone matrix," she said, while praising the authors for using multiple methods. Her objection is size: one of the imaged structures measured roughly 15 microns, which she noted is smaller than nearly all red blood cells of non-mammals.
Mauricio Barbi of the University of Regina, also not involved in the work, called the evidence convincing for mineralized structures consistent with red blood cells. He added that identifying them still involves interpretation, since what survives are chemical remnants and mineral structures rather than intact cells or hemoglobin.
Earlier research has also reported blood-related chemistry in dinosaur fossils. A 1997 study reported evidence for heme-containing compounds or hemoglobin breakdown products in Tyrannosaurus rex bone extracts. A 2025 study used resonance Raman methods to investigate partial hemoglobin preservation in dinosaur remains.