Hermes Vector

Politics

California voters reject billionaire wealth tax measure

California voters rejected Proposition 40, a measure that would have imposed a one-time 5% tax on wealth over $1 billion, with 53.8% voting against it.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Deutsch · 中文

Checked against 2 sourceswashingtonexaminer.comthestar.com

In brief

  • California voters rejected Proposition 40, with 53.8% voting against and 47.2% in favor.
  • The measure would have imposed a one-time 5% tax on wealth over $1 billion.
  • Revenue would have funded Medi-Cal and similar healthcare programs for low-income Californians.
  • Gov. Gavin Newsom opposed the measure, saying billionaires could leave the state.

California voters reject billionaire wealth tax measure

California voters rejected a measure that would have taxed the wealth of the state’s billionaires. Proposition 40 failed with 53.8% voting against it and 47.2% in favor as of Monday evening, according to the Associated Press, which called the election at 9:38 p.m. with 83% of the vote counted.

The measure

The ballot initiative would have imposed a one-time tax equal to 5% of the accumulated wealth of affected taxpayers. The levy would have applied to taxpayers with taxable assets, including stocks, homes, artwork, and more, worth more than $1 billion.

If the wealth tax passed, its revenue would have funded Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program, and similar healthcare programs for low-income Californians.

Proponents argued that it could raise the Golden State some $100 billion in revenue. The ballot measure’s sponsors, SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, said the money would be used to shield the state’s healthcare system from projected federal funding cuts.

Opposition and analysis

California Gov. Gavin Newsom came out against the measure. Newsom argued that such a law would cause billionaires to move to other states, which would hurt the economy and tax base.

An analysis written by Stanford University economists Benjamin Jaros and Joshua Rauh and circulated as a working paper by the National Bureau of Economic Research found the revenue estimates were being grossly oversold. The analysis also found that California’s treasury could have taken an overall hit if the wealth tax led billionaires to flee the state, thereby depriving it of years of their income tax payments.

Support

Backers of the legislation saw Proposition 40 as a blueprint for wealth taxes in other states and at the federal level. Six Nobel Prize-winning economists wrote an open letter arguing that the move could “kickstart” a movement for higher taxes on the wealthy across the United States. The economists, Daron Acemoglu, Abhijit Banerjee, Peter Diamond, Esther Duflo, Paul Krugman, and Joseph Stiglitz, have all supported taxing the wealthy more.

“California is the right place to take this historic step,” the group wrote in the letter of support.

Likewise, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has called Proposition 40 “a model that should be emulated throughout the country.”

Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West was the initiative’s top supporter.

Why it matters

If the ballot measure had passed, it would have been the first major tax on general wealth, as opposed to income, in modern U.S. history.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.