Albertsons seeks over $9 billion from Kroger after failed merger

Albertsons Cos. is demanding that Kroger Co. pay more than $9 billion for the collapse of what would have been the largest US grocery chain merger in history. Lawyers for Albertsons made the demand Monday in Delaware Chancery Court, where a two-week trial is slated later this month in a legal fight over who is to blame for the failure of the $24.6 billion deal. The plan to combine the two largest US grocery chains was blocked by a federal court in December 2024.

Damages and Legal Claims

Albertsons wants Judge Lori Will to find that Kroger "willfully" breached the merger agreement by failing to use "best efforts" to get regulatory approval, including a refusal to alter its plan to divest certain assets. According to the court filing, Kroger should pay more than $9.3 billion. This amount includes a premium stockholders would have gotten if the deal had closed, a $600 million termination fee plus $75 million in interest and additional costs.

Albertsons stated in the filing that under the terms of the agreement, Kroger had agreed "to remove any antitrust impediment to the merger — with no limit except that Kroger did not have to divest more than 650 stores." The company argued, "Kroger willfully breached these maximalist contractual commitments. Kroger wanted the Merger but only on its own terms."

In a statement accompanying the filing, Albertsons said, "The bottom line is that Kroger made a promise and broke it. Kroger should be held accountable for the harm it caused our shareholders, associates, and customers – and we look forward to proving our case in court." A Kroger representatives didn't provide an immediate comment on the Albertsons filing.

Background of the Failed Deal

The merger would have seen Kroger, the largest US grocery chain, acquire the No. 2 grocer, Albertsons, with the aim of boosting competition against Amazon.com Inc., Walmart Inc. and other non-unionized rivals. To win regulatory approval, the companies agreed to sell hundreds of stores to C&S Wholesale Grocers Inc. However, the US Federal Trade Commission argued the divestiture plan was insufficient to address antitrust concerns. A federal judge ruled in favor of the FTC, effectively killing the deal.

Shareholder Impact and Counter-Allegations

If Albertsons wins its case, its stockholders would benefit. The publicly-listed company counts private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management as its largest shareholder, with a more than 30% stake at the end of June.

The legal battle has grown increasingly bitter in the months since the deal collapsed. Albertsons terminated the agreement and filed suit, claiming Kroger prioritized its own profit targets over meeting regulatory requirements. Kroger has countered that it made every possible effort to secure approval and has accused Albertsons of undermining its divestiture proposal to regulators. Kroger also alleged that Albertsons secretly worked with C&S to pressure regulators into demanding more store divestitures than necessary. C&S has maintained that all of its communications with Kroger, Albertsons, and regulators met contractual, legal, and ethical obligations and were aimed at obtaining regulatory approval.

Why it matters

The outcome of the trial could reshape how merger agreements are structured in industries where regulatory risk is high, particularly in sectors with significant antitrust scrutiny. If Albertsons prevails, acquirers may face greater pressure to exhaust every possible remedy to satisfy regulators, rather than walking away when divestiture requirements become burdensome. The case also highlights the financial stakes for shareholders, as the merger premium represents real value that evaporated when the deal collapsed.

---

Sources

• finance.yahoo.com: Albertsons Seeks More Than $9 Billion Over Busted Kroger Deal
• finance.biggo.com: Albertsons Demands Kroger Pay Over $9 Billion for Failed Grocery Merger — BigGo Finance

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.