Hermes Vector

Politics

Judge temporarily blocks Trump golf course redevelopment in Washington

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order halting work at East Potomac Golf Links before its scheduled closure, blocking President Trump's redevelopment plan for now.

By Hermes Vector

Also in: Español · Français

Checked against 3 sourcesctvnews.cabnnbloomberg.cathestar.com
Illustration for: Judge temporarily blocks Trump golf course redevelopment in Washington

In brief

  • Judge Ana Reyes issued a temporary restraining order stopping work at East Potomac Golf Links.
  • The course was scheduled to close Sunday for 15 months under the Trump redevelopment plan.
  • Plaintiffs, including the DC Preservation League, argue the plan would make the course unaffordable.
  • The Justice Department has asked for Reyes to be removed from the case; she has not recused herself.

Judge temporarily blocks Trump golf course redevelopment in Washington

A U.S. judge on Saturday ordered a temporary stop to any work at a historic Washington public golf course, blocking for now President Donald Trump’s push to redevelop the site along the Potomac River into a championship-level venue.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes issued the temporary restraining order before the East Potomac Golf Links was due to close Sunday for 15 months. Trump had announced work would begin that day despite the legal challenge initiated against the project in February by the DC Preservation League and two local golfers.

The plaintiffs argue that Trump’s plan would change the character of the accessible golf course and make it unaffordable, something the Republican president denies. They had sought the stop-work order, saying that closing the course and launching work on the project would “irreparably injure plaintiffs and the public interest.”

Court hearing and arguments

Reyes had signaled throughout a five-hour court hearing Friday that she was likely to issue some stoppage for the park closure. Justice Department lawyer Adam Gustafson argued that the entire East Potomac Park, which includes three golf courses, a miniature course, bike riding lanes and other recreational areas, was being closed because of safety factors. He also noted that the lease between the government and the current operator, National Links Trust, was ending Sunday.

Reyes pointed out that safety had not been part of the discussion over the closure for months and that ending the lease felt more like an action that provided a premise for the closure rather than an action that led to the closure of the course about 2 miles from the White House.

She also rejected Gustafson’s argument that the closure was separate from Trump’s repeated pronouncements that he wanted the course to be closed and renovated into a world-class venue and had called repeatedly for the park’s closure by the deadline as part of what is known as the Washington National plan.

Trump response and broader context

Even before the order, Trump lashed out in a social media post Saturday, contending that Reyes “doesn’t want us to quickly and inexpensively fix up the Course which is, also, very dangerous.” He said people who live in the Washington area would get a 50 per cent discount on “any and all Rates charged” and that the redevelopment would “evolve into something very special, something which the Judge will be able to take great pride in seeing!”

Reyes’ order was the latest in a series of rulings in lawsuits challenging Trump’s projects that were issued just hours before construction was expected to begin. A different judge recently ordered a 14-day delay on work for the arch, a decision that came shortly after a key planning commission stacked with Trump appointees approved plans for the project.

Judge’s background and related case issues

Reyes, who was nominated to the court by Democratic President Joe Biden, had for months been reticent about approving the plaintiffs’ requests for work stoppages. Her reluctance to issue orders ended in October, spurred in part by a tree-cutting spree by the administration over a holiday weekend with little notification to the judge or plaintiffs.

The Justice Department filed a request that Reyes be removed from the case because of what it called her “egregious behavior” and questioned her impartiality. Reyes has not recused herself.

She announced plans last week to name Jessie Liu, a former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, to examine whether officials with the Interior Department and the National Park Service and attorneys with the Justice Department had violated ethics or misled her during the course of the case. Gustafson asked her to reconsider and give the Justice Department the opportunity to show an outside investigator was unnecessary.

“It’s quite a cloud on the people it affects,” he said.

Reyes said she understood.

“To be frank with you I don’t want to do this,” she said, but she had an ethical obligation to at least look because “I think there is enough smoke that someone needs to consider whether there’s been fire.”

Why it matters

The order halts the Trump administration’s redevelopment of a historic public golf course near the White House, pausing a project the president has championed as part of broader efforts to remake Washington. The case also involves separate scrutiny of administration officials’ conduct during the litigation.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

Who issued the temporary restraining order blocking the redevelopment?
U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes issued the temporary restraining order on Saturday.
What is the status of the East Potomac Golf Links closure?
The course was due to close on Sunday for 15 months, but the judge ordered a temporary stop to any work before that deadline.
Who initiated the legal challenge against the project?
The legal challenge was initiated in February by the DC Preservation League and two local golfers.
Why did the Justice Department request Judge Reyes be removed from the case?
The Justice Department filed a request for her removal because they called her behavior egregious and questioned her impartiality.
What broader context does this ruling fit into?
The order is part of a series of rulings challenging Trump’s projects issued just hours before construction was expected to begin.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.