Expert Opinions and Data
Dan Owen, a researcher at the Israeli human rights group Yesh Din, told BBC Verify that he believes the IDF often tries to "prolong" investigations. "They try to stretch out these processes to the point where people forget and people don't care about them," he said.
Freedom of Information data obtained by Yesh Din showed that between October 2023 and August 2024, at least 1,456 Gaza-related incidents were referred to the IDF's General Staff Fact-Finding and Assessment Mechanism (FFAM). Only 12 reviews were completed and referred to the Military Advocate General (MAG) Corps, with two resulting in criminal investigations.
Eran Shamir-Borer, a former top lawyer for the IDF and director of the Center for Security and Democracy at the Israeli Democracy Institute, acknowledged "genuine challenges" in investigating allegations in complex combat environments. However, he stated that Israel would benefit from being more transparent and encouraged the IDF to be "more forthcoming with information that they are sharing with the public."
Michael Schmitt, a professor of international law at the University of Reading, said that not every allegation triggers a full-blown investigation and that operational details often remain confidential to prevent enemy forces from adapting. He described the IDF's legal division as the "gold standard in terms of understanding the law."