Concerns over AI and content usage
Critics and media organizations have expressed concern that the terms would allow Meta to scrape content without payment to build competing services, such as AI products. A report by the Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard University stated that, as written, "the new terms could be used to argue that Meta can scrape content from news sites and use that content to train the company’s AI products."
Meta has denied that the update is intended to scrape news sites. "This update is designed to make sure we’re able to pull accurate information about products for sale on third-party websites when making on-platform ad and content recommendations, not about scraping news sites," wrote Meta spokesman Andy Stone on X on Oct. 16.
In the United States, the Association of American Publishers (AAP) called for Meta to drop the terms. "In putting forth these onerous terms of service, Meta is implicitly acknowledging that permission is required for them to use creative works to develop and improve their products," said Maria A. Pallante, AAP president and CEO. "But at the same time this mega-corporation is abusing its dominant market power by compelling such consent from any commercial user who connects to any of their platforms."