Hermes Vector

Politics

Trump administration sues California to block counting of 20,000 alleged noncitizen ballots

The Justice Department sued California on Oct. 15, seeking to stop the state from counting mail-in ballots from 20,000 voters it alleges are likely noncitizens. State officials rejected the claim as meritless and based on unreliable data.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Français · हिन्दी

Checked against 3 sourceslatimes.comnewschannel5.comtippinsights.com
Illustration for: Trump administration sues California to block counting of 20,000 alleged noncitizen ballots

In brief

  • The Justice Department sued California on Oct. 15 to block counting ballots from 20,000 alleged noncitizens.
  • California officials called the lawsuit meritless, citing unreliable federal data and previous errors in Nevada.
  • The federal government provided a list on a thumb drive with a password on a sticky note, which state officials deemed insecure.
  • The lawsuit seeks an injunction to stop ballot counting until citizenship status is verified, ahead of the Nov. 3 midterms.

Trump administration sues California to block counting of 20,000 alleged noncitizen ballots

The Trump administration filed a lawsuit against California on Oct. 15, asking a federal court to immediately bar the state from counting ballots from approximately 20,000 voters whom the administration alleges are “likely noncitizens.” The legal action comes just three weeks before the Nov. 3 midterm elections, during which California voters have already begun casting mail-in ballots.

Federal Allegations and Legal Demands

According to the lawsuit, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services conducted a “multiagency and multilevel review” of state voter and federal citizenship data. The agency determined with “high confidence” that around 20,000 “likely noncitizens” are registered to vote in the state. The lawsuit states that these individuals have been sent vote-by-mail ballots, with many addresses listed in Los Angeles County.

The filing argues that “California is thus knowingly imposing an obstacle on the United States’ ability to enforce [federal election law] by facilitating unlawful voting rather than working with the Federal Government to prevent it.” The Justice Department seeks an injunction to prevent the state from counting these ballots “until those individuals’ citizenship status can be verified.”

U.S. Atty. Gen. Todd Blanche defended the action in a statement. “State-facilitated voter fraud is unacceptable in the United States of America,” Blanche said. “If found responsible in a court of law, the State of California will have seriously undermined confidence in our electoral system and violated laws that protect our nation’s representative system of government.”

State Officials Reject Claims as Unsubstantiated

California officials strongly rejected the federal government’s assertions, labeling the lawsuit “meritless” and criticizing the timing and reliability of the federal data. Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote on X that the move was a “sad, desperate attempt by Trump to use his politicized Justice Department to try to suppress California voters just three weeks before Election Day.”

California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta stated, “Every count, recount, hand count, lawsuit, and audit has found that there’s no widespread voter fraud in the U.S.” He added that the administration’s demands were “meritless” and that the state would defend its election processes in court.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber noted that the federal government had previously alleged that more than 190,000 noncitizens were registered in California, a figure that dropped to 20,000 in the current lawsuit. Weber wrote that the federal government failed to clarify the basis for suspecting the listed individuals are non-citizens. She cited a recent court case noting that federal citizenship records are “known to be unreliable.”

Dispute Over Data and Methodology

The conflict escalated after Acting Deputy Atty. Gen. Trent McCotter sent letters to Weber and Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan, giving them 48 hours to set aside the ballots for investigation. Logan stated that his office received a password-protected thumb drive with the list, but the password was provided on a “sticky note,” which he did not consider secure. Logan said the Justice Department “has not provided the underlying evidence, source, or methodology supporting its assertions.”

Weber highlighted a similar incident in Nevada, where the Department of Homeland Security initially alleged nearly 16,000 potential non-citizens on voter rolls but “failed to establish that a single non-citizen was on the voter rolls” after working with the state. The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to requests for clarification on how the estimate dropped from 190,000 to 20,000.

Why it matters

This lawsuit represents a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s efforts to intervene in state-run elections, challenging the traditional separation between federal enforcement and state election administration. The case raises critical questions about the reliability of federal citizenship data and the legal standards for disenfranchising voters close to an election. With the midterms approaching, the outcome could set a precedent for federal authority over state ballot counting processes and impact voter confidence nationwide.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

Who filed the lawsuit against California and when?
The Trump administration filed the lawsuit against California on Oct. 15.
What is the Trump administration demanding regarding 20,000 ballots?
The administration is asking a federal court to immediately bar California from counting ballots from approximately 20,000 voters whom they allege are likely noncitizens.
Why do California officials reject the lawsuit?
California officials label the lawsuit meritless and criticize the reliability of federal data, noting that previous federal allegations of 190,000 noncitizens dropped to 20,000 without clarification.
What specific evidence issues did Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan raise?
Logan stated that the Justice Department provided the list on a password-protected thumb drive with the password on a sticky note and failed to provide underlying evidence, source, or methodology.
Why does this lawsuit matter for the upcoming election?
The lawsuit challenges the separation between federal enforcement and state election administration just three weeks before the Nov. 3 midterm elections, potentially setting a precedent for federal authority over state ballot counting.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

PoliticsTrending

Trump Demands New Mexico Be Renamed 'New America' in Truth Social Post

President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social demanding New Mexico change its name to 'New America,' citing prestige and election integrity. This follows previous attempts to rename geographic features and occurs amid midterm election campaigning.

Checked against 2 sourcesrollingstone.commotherjones.com