Hermes Vector

World

Toronto cyclists seek Supreme Court appeal against bike lane removal

Cycle Toronto and Ecojustice are asking the Supreme Court of Canada to review a lower court ruling that upheld Ontario's plan to remove bike lanes. Construction to remove lanes on Bloor Street West began Tuesday night.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Checked against 6 sourcesnationalobserver.comcp24.comnarcity.comctvnews.cathestar.comthespec.com
Illustration for: Toronto cyclists seek Supreme Court appeal against bike lane removal

In brief

  • Cycle Toronto is seeking a Supreme Court of Canada appeal against Ontario's bike lane removal plan.
  • Construction to remove bike lanes on a 600-metre stretch of Bloor Street West began Tuesday night.
  • The Ontario Court of Appeal previously ruled in August that the province has the right to remove the lanes.
  • Cycle Toronto argues the removal puts lives at risk, while the province cites traffic congestion costs.

Toronto cyclists seek Supreme Court appeal against bike lane removal

Toronto cyclists are seeking an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada to challenge the province’s plan to remove bike lanes, as construction to dismantle lanes along Bloor Street West began Tuesday night. The legal battle centers on Ontario’s Bill 212, which ordered the removal of bike lanes on Bloor Street, Yonge Street, and University Avenue to replace them with motor vehicle lanes.

Legal History and Current Status

The case has seen conflicting rulings in lower courts. Initially, a judge in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled the order unconstitutional, finding it put lives at risk. However, in August, Ontario’s Court of Appeal overturned that decision, ruling in favor of the province’s right to remove the lanes. The Court of Appeal stated that Bill 212 is “the sort of decision legislatures make routinely without attracting any concerns about the constitutionality of their actions.”

Cycle Toronto, the advocacy group leading the challenge, argues that the Court of Appeal’s decision does not address the full breadth of how government action can be scrutinized under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Supreme Court must accept the request for leave to appeal before a hearing can proceed. The Supreme Court typically hears cases involving key constitutional questions or conflicting lower court decisions.

Arguments from Both Sides

Michael Longfield, Executive Director of Cycle Toronto, stated that the facts supporting their Charter argument remain valid. “bike lanes do not cause traffic congestion, ripping them out will put people's lives at risk and no network of side streets can replace [the lanes],” Longfield said. He added that the removal was never about “common sense,” pointing to reports that the province rejected city alternatives that would have restored a vehicle lane while keeping bike lanes.

Bronwyn Roe of Ecojustice, an environmental law charity backing the case, framed the appeal as a broader legal issue. “This case is about the scope of the protections provided by Section 7 of the Charter to everyone’s rights to life and security of the person. We’re asking the Supreme Court to hear this appeal to bring clarity to this broader legal question,” Roe said.

The province has defended the removals as necessary for traffic management. Dakota Brasier stated, “The people of Ontario gave our government a clear mandate to tackle the traffic that is costing our economy over $56 billion a year by removing the bike lanes on some of Toronto’s busiest streets.” Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria previously called the Court of Appeal ruling “a victory for common sense and for respecting the appropriate division of roles between duly elected legislatures and the courts.”

Construction and City Response

The province issued a request for proposals to remove 19 kilometres of bike lanes, prioritizing a 600-metre stretch along Bloor Street West starting at Clissold Road in Etobicoke. Construction on this section began Tuesday night. A spokesperson for Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria did not immediately respond to questions regarding the specific location, duration, or cost of the work.

A spokesperson for Mayor Olivia Chow said the city repeatedly shared designs with the province that would keep both vehicle and bike lanes intact. The city noted that work has already been completed to restore a car lane while keeping the bike lane on a short stretch of Bloor Street between Kipling and Islington subway stations.

Why it matters

The outcome of this appeal could set a precedent for the scope of Section 7 of the Charter regarding government policies that impact public safety. It also highlights the ongoing tension between provincial legislative authority and municipal infrastructure planning in Ontario.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

What is the current status of the legal battle over Toronto's bike lanes?
Toronto cyclists are seeking an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada to challenge the province’s plan to remove bike lanes after the Court of Appeal overturned a lower court ruling that had found the order unconstitutional.
Which specific streets are affected by the bike lane removals under Bill 212?
Bill 212 ordered the removal of bike lanes on Bloor Street, Yonge Street, and University Avenue to replace them with motor vehicle lanes.
When did construction to dismantle the bike lanes begin?
Construction to dismantle lanes along Bloor Street West began Tuesday night.
Why do the cyclists and their legal supporters want the Supreme Court to hear the case?
They argue that the removal puts people's lives at risk and seek clarity on the scope of protections provided by Section 7 of the Charter regarding rights to life and security of the person.
What is the province's justification for removing the bike lanes?
The province states the removals are necessary for traffic management to tackle congestion that is costing the economy over $56 billion a year.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

Comments

World

Lockheed Martin Unveils PAC-3 Edge Interceptor for Hypersonic Threats

Lockheed Martin has announced the PAC-3 Edge, a new missile interceptor designed to counter hypersonic and maneuverable threats. The system features a multi-pulse motor and new seeker technology, with testing scheduled for 2027.

Checked against 5 sourceswashingtonexaminer.comdefensemirror.comairdatanews.com+2 more

WorldTrending

Pope Leo XIV diagnosed with lung cancer after successful surgery

Pope Leo XIV has been diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma following surgery to remove part of his right lung. The Vatican confirmed the operation was successful and stated there are currently no plans for chemotherapy.

Checked against 4 sourcesmirror.co.ukBBCindependent.co.uk+1 more