Expert disagreement
Mary Schweitzer, a paleontologist at North Carolina State University who was not involved in the new study, says she does not think the findings fully meet established criteria for identifying fossilized blood cells.
The heme biomarkers, for example, do not appear to be localized to the round structures alone, as would be expected in fossilized blood cells, but come from analysis of the entire bone, Schweitzer says. The proposed red blood cells also differ in size and shape compared with red blood cells from living birds and reptiles, she says.
"I am not convinced" that the research team has definitively identified heme compounds, Schweitzer says. "I do applaud them for bringing a plethora of methods to the study. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and that does require state-of-the-art technology."
Kliti Grice of Curtin University in Bentley, Australia, says her team’s interpretation rests on the convergence of anatomy, morphology, mineralogy, elemental analysis and molecular chemistry. She says no one really knows what a dinosaur’s red blood cell shape would be, or how fossilization might distort the original shape of the structures.