Hermes Vector

Health

NIH study links PFOA and PFOS to higher rates of aggressive breast cancer

An NIH study found women with high blood levels of two forever chemicals had up to 93% higher rates of ER-negative breast cancer, an aggressive form of the disease.

By Hermes Vector

Also in: Español · Português · Français · Deutsch · 中文

Checked against 3 sourcesScienceDailysouthfloridahospitalnews.comewg.org
Illustration for: NIH study links PFOA and PFOS to higher rates of aggressive breast cancer

In brief

  • NIH study links PFOA and PFOS to higher rates of ER-negative breast cancer, an aggressive form of the disease.
  • Women with the highest PFOS exposure had a 93% higher rate of ER-negative breast cancer than the lowest exposure group.
  • The highest PFOA exposure group had a 67% higher rate of ER-negative breast cancer than the lowest group.
  • The study found an association, not proof that the chemicals directly cause breast cancer.

NIH study links PFOA and PFOS to higher rates of aggressive breast cancer

A National Institutes of Health study has linked two common "forever chemicals" to higher rates of an aggressive form of breast cancer, according to research published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Study findings

Women with higher blood levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) were more likely to develop estrogen receptor-negative, or ER-negative, breast cancer, the NIH said. The study found no clear link between either chemical and breast cancer risk overall.

Women in the highest PFOA exposure group had a 67% higher rate of ER-negative breast cancer than women in the lowest group. For PFOS, the highest exposure group showed a 93% higher rate, nearly twice that of the lowest group.

"Our findings, which we confirmed using a meta-analysis of prior research, indicate that certain legacy PFAS, including PFOA and PFOS, are associated with a higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, a more aggressive tumor type with few known risk factors," explained NIH Stadtman Investigator Alexandra White, Ph.D., who led the study.

The percentages represent relative differences between groups rather than the absolute probability that an individual woman will develop breast cancer. The findings establish an association, not proof that the chemicals directly cause the disease.

Study design

The analysis used data from the Sister Study, conducted by NIH's National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). Between 2003 and 2009, the study enrolled 50,884 women ages 35-74 from across the United States and Puerto Rico. All participants were free of breast cancer when they enrolled, although each had a full or half-sister who had already been diagnosed with the disease.

For the PFAS investigation, researchers analyzed information from 1,609 women who subsequently developed breast cancer and a comparison group of 2,269 women. The researchers measured concentrations of 17 different PFAS chemicals in blood samples collected years before participants received a cancer diagnosis.

Context and next steps

ER-negative breast cancer differs from more common forms because its tumor cells lack the receptors that allow estrogen to stimulate cancer growth. These cancers are often more aggressive and generally have poorer outcomes than tumors that respond to estrogen.

PFOA and PFOS belong to a large family of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly called PFAS. These chemicals have been used in numerous everyday consumer products and are often described as "forever chemicals" because they resist breaking down in the environment. They can also accumulate in the human body and remain there for years.

Both substances have largely been phased out and replaced with other PFAS compounds, but measurable amounts are still present in most people's bodies. The researchers said additional investigations should focus on populations with greater PFAS exposure and on newer replacement PFAS chemicals.

"More research is needed, particularly evaluating the risk of breast cancer associated with newer replacement PFAS chemicals," White said.

The research received support from NIEHS grants Z01ES044005; Z1AES103332; and R01ES032831.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

What did the NIH study find regarding PFOA and PFOS levels and breast cancer?
The study found that women with higher blood levels of PFOA and PFOS were more likely to develop estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, a more aggressive tumor type. However, the research found no clear link between either chemical and breast cancer risk overall.
How much higher were the rates of ER-negative breast cancer in the highest exposure groups?
Women in the highest PFOA exposure group had a 67% higher rate of ER-negative breast cancer than those in the lowest group. For PFOS, the highest exposure group showed a 93% higher rate compared to the lowest group.
What was the design and scope of the Sister Study used for this research?
The analysis used data from the Sister Study, which enrolled 50,884 women ages 35-74 between 2003 and 2009. For the PFAS investigation, researchers analyzed blood samples from 1,609 women who developed breast cancer and a comparison group of 2,269 women.
Why is ER-negative breast cancer considered more aggressive?
ER-negative breast cancer is considered more aggressive because its tumor cells lack the receptors that allow estrogen to stimulate cancer growth. These cancers generally have poorer outcomes than tumors that respond to estrogen.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.