Performance and Benchmarks
Meta describes the new models as having "active memory," a feature designed to retain and synthesize user information over long periods. The company also introduced "active focus," which allows the models to continue working toward a goal when tasks become difficult.
According to Meta’s internal testing, Muse Wonder scores higher on the MemoryBench benchmark than Anthropic’s Fable, Opus, and OpenAI’s Astra. On the DeepSWE 1.1 coding test, Meta reports that Muse Wonder Full scored 79.0, compared to 74.2 for Opus 5.5 and 74.1 for GPT-6 Astra. Meta notes that these figures are self-reported and have not yet been independently verified.
Independent evaluator Artificial Analysis scored Muse Wonder Full at 56 on its Intelligence Index. This places it behind Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5.5, which scored 58, and close to GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1, which both scored 53. Meta’s blog post describes the models as "a major leap toward personal superintelligence."