Legal Arguments and Statute of Limitations
U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden heard arguments for nearly two hours regarding whether the government improperly sought to extend the statute of limitations by filing a "criminal information" rather than an indictment. An indictment requires sign-off from a grand jury, whereas an information does not.
Attorneys for Comey argued that the underlying law does not allow for a charge to be brought by information for the purpose of pausing the statute of limitations deadline. In response, DOJ attorneys argued that the term "indictment" should be understood more broadly as a charging act.
DOJ attorney Dustin Farahnak stated that the government's active investigation has uncovered evidence that could include actions taken as recently as April of 2017. If true, this would extend the government's ability to potentially charge Comey for another six months. Under the Espionage Act, there is a 10-year deadline for bringing charges.