The ruling
The judge wrote that, accepting the allegations in the complaint as true, Trump plausibly pled damages where he alleges a defamatory documentary released toward the election caused reputational harm. He noted the significance of the documentary's editing decision, which spliced together comments made by Trump that were nearly 55 minutes apart, something the BBC has apologized for.
"On its face, the editing may independently establish the plausibility of actual malice," the judge wrote. "BBC tries to frame this editing as ordinary editing done to condense a seventy-minute-long speech into twelve seconds. But the Court is not persuaded."
The judge also wrote that "Trump's allegations regarding BBC's departure from journalistic standards are more than enough to plausibly alleged more than mere negligence".