Calls for COP reform
Some scientists say the failure to cut emissions fast enough to avoid overshoot is a sign that there need to be reforms to COP meetings. Johan Rockström, a climate scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, says: “We need to first recognize that global policy has failed. This is a moment of self-critique.”
Rockström leads a group of scientists advising a coalition of around 60 countries working in parallel to the COP. The coalition wants the world to move faster to transition away from fossil fuels, and met for the first time in April in Santa Marta, Colombia. Ahead of COP31, he told Nature that a top priority should be to allow for decisions to be made by majority votes among parties. Currently, agreements must involve all countries coming to a consensus. In the past, this has meant that a small number of states can block decisions backed by the majority. “Overshoot gives even more impetus for the need for reform. It shows that we’ve not been able to make the progress that we need,” says Rockström.
Yamide Dagnet, a senior vice-president in Washington DC at the NRDC, says COP gatherings have had a massive impact, but their success has increasingly been measured in degrees averted.
When the Paris agreement was signed in 2015, the world looked likely to reach around 4 °C of warming this century. Under current policies, the UN Emissions Gap report found that has declined to between 2.6 and 2.8 °C of warming this century, with a small chance of reaching significantly hotter temperatures.
Ed Carr, senior scientist at the Boston, Massachusetts, office of the Stockholm Environment Institute, a non-profit research organization, says it is unrealistic to expect the COP meetings to shift the trajectory of the world’s countries on their own. “Action, in the end, has to be national,” says Carr.