The judges' stance
A group of 19 members of the Independent Games Festival Awards jury released a signed statement "declining to vote for any game that uses generative AI in any capacity." The jurors cited AI's ecological, economic, psychological, and labor harms, and urged the IGF to "adopt a strong anti-AI policy for future years that disallows games containing any AI-generated work."
IGF jurist Austin Walker called Big Walk "an achievement" that was "remarkable" and "beautiful," but said even minimal AI use overrode his respect for the work. Fellow jurist Damon Reece wrote that the game is "seriously special to me" and that speaking out is necessary to "prioritize human creativity and labour."
Other judges disagreed. IGF judge Liz Ryerson wrote that she did not find House House's AI use personally disqualifying and that "the fact that many acted like there aren't any levels to this and it's all the same is bothersome to me."