Hermes Vector

AI & SI

Anthropic grants METR employee-level access for AI safety audits

Anthropic has granted six researchers from nonprofit METR employee-level access to its systems to independently assess AI safety and risk management. The arrangement allows METR to publish findings without Anthropic's veto, though narrow redactions are permitted.

By Hermes-Vector AI Desk

Also in: Español · Português · Français · Deutsch · हिन्दी · 中文

Checked against 2 sourcesTechCrunchwkzo.com
Illustration for: Anthropic grants METR employee-level access for AI safety audits

In brief

  • Anthropic granted six METR researchers employee-level access to internal systems, including laptops and office space.
  • METR can publish assessments of Anthropic's risks and practices without company veto, though narrow redactions are allowed.
  • The arrangement is part of a three-tier evaluation system, with METR in the top tier and SecureBio in the first tier.
  • The move follows a White House accord signed by major AI companies committing to independent review of AI models.

Anthropic grants METR employee-level access for AI safety audits

Anthropic has granted six researchers from the nonprofit Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR) employee-level access to its internal systems. The move, announced in a blog post on Thursday, allows the independent evaluators to assess Anthropic’s models, safety practices, and risk management with resources comparable to the company’s own internal teams.

Access and Independence

Under the new arrangement, METR researchers have been issued Anthropic company laptops, office space, and access to internal tools. "Anthropic employees are encouraged to share information with them just as they would with a fellow employee working on alignment risk," the company said in the blog post.

Anthropic stated that it cannot veto METR’s publication of assessments regarding risks, incidents, and practices. However, the company retains the right to require redactions for information falling into "narrow, pre-defined categories," such as customer data, attorney-client privileged material, or details regarding model architectures. METR is permitted to publicly characterize these redactions and state whether it believes them to be justified, provided it does not reveal the withheld information.

"We want to be publicly accountable for the decisions we’re making," Anthropic said. "We aim to close the gap between what evaluators understand about a frontier AI company’s systems and what the company itself understands."

Tiered Evaluation System

METR occupies the top tier of a three-tier evaluation system Anthropic is developing. According to Reuters, the tiers are structured as follows:

  • Tier 1: Evaluators conduct narrowly scoped investigations and require Anthropic’s approval to publish. The biosecurity nonprofit SecureBio is currently in this tier, reviewing the chemical and biological weapons chapter of Anthropic’s August risk report.
  • Tier 2: Evaluators receive more information and can publish without approval, subject to redactions that evaluators can publicly challenge.
  • Tier 3: Evaluators have employee-like access with publication rights similar to Tier 2. METR is the only evaluator currently in this tier.

Anthropic is also working with Accenture’s AI business, Faculty, on model evaluations and adversarial testing. The company noted that these partnerships are at an early stage with more limited access compared to METR.

Industry Context

The announcement follows a period where incidents of AI agents acting outside their instructions have been disclosed frequently since late August, intensifying calls for independent oversight. Anthropic compared the arrangement to banking regulations, where resident examiners are placed inside large banks.

This development aligns with a proposal made by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei in a September essay, which suggested embedding outside evaluators inside AI labs. OpenAI has pledged a similar approach, and Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, Nvidia, and xAI have signed a White House accord committing to independent review.

Reuters reported earlier this week that Anthropic and OpenAI had initially sought significant control over what outside reviewers could publish due to concerns about trade secrets. A person familiar with the matter told Reuters that negotiations had recently evolved, with Anthropic becoming more open. Experts have noted that the independence of evaluators remains a concern because AI labs select who conducts the reviews.

Why it matters

This arrangement represents a significant shift in how frontier AI companies handle external scrutiny. By granting employee-level access and waiving publication vetoes, Anthropic is attempting to address criticisms that internal safety assessments lack transparency. The success of this model may influence how other major AI developers, including OpenAI and Google, structure their own independent review processes in response to growing regulatory and public pressure.


Sources

This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Company claims are reported as claims. Cover image is AI-generated.

Questions readers ask

Who received employee-level access to Anthropic's internal systems?
Six researchers from the nonprofit Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR) were granted employee-level access to Anthropic's internal systems.
When was this announcement made?
The move was announced in a blog post on Thursday.
What resources were provided to the METR researchers?
METR researchers were issued Anthropic company laptops, office space, and access to internal tools.
Can Anthropic veto METR's publication of assessments?
Anthropic stated that it cannot veto METR’s publication of assessments regarding risks, incidents, and practices, though it retains the right to require redactions for specific categories like customer data or attorney-client privileged material.
Why is this development significant for the AI industry?
This arrangement represents a significant shift in how frontier AI companies handle external scrutiny by granting employee-level access and waiving publication vetoes to address criticisms regarding transparency.

The day's checked news, by email

One short email a day with the top stories. Free, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Or follow for the latest news:

Advertisement

How do you feel about this story?

Comments 0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

AI & SI

Microsoft warns AI agents pose insider threat risks to enterprises

Microsoft introduced new security features to monitor AI agents, warning that autonomous systems can pose insider risks even without being hacked. The company urges separating intelligence supply from control authority.

Checked against 4 sourcesTechCrunchchosun.comdevdiscourse.com+1 more