Policy and Rhetoric
The candidates presented sharply different platforms. El-Sayed campaigned on a platform that included support for “Medicare for all,” abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and cutting military aid to Israel. He also focused on issues regarding the cost of living and curbing the influence of corporate money in politics.
Rogers, a former seven-term congressman and FBI agent, argued that El-Sayed’s single-payer healthcare proposal would cost trillions of dollars and limit patient choices. Rogers also sought to distinguish himself from some of President Trump’s policies, such as tariffs.
Foreign policy and religious identity were central to the campaign's tension. El-Sayed faced criticism from some Jewish Democrats and Republican opponents regarding his rhetoric on Israel. State Rep. Noah Arbit, founder of the Michigan Democratic Jewish Caucus, criticized El-Sayed after he told ABC News that Israel was not a “friend” of the United States. Rogers frequently used these issues to appeal to voters, and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee made a large last-minute donation to support Rogers.
President Trump and Rogers also utilized sharp rhetoric against El-Sayed. Trump accused El-Sayed of being a "jihadist" during a rally in Michigan, stating, "If Abdul and the Democrats win, they will open the floodgates and invite hordes of jihadis to our shores, creating a nightmare of violence and terror until you cannot even have a Christmas."